拍品 5
拍品 5
ALBRECHT DÜRER (1471-1528)

The Great Column with the Satyr (Block IV)

成交价 GBP 32,760
估价
GBP 26,000 - GBP 35,000
估价并不反映实际成交价,亦不包括买家应付酬金、任何适用税项或艺术家转售权。详情请浏览业务规定D部。
Loading details
登记
分享
ALBRECHT DÜRER (1471-1528)

The Great Column with the Satyr (Block IV)

成交价 GBP 32,760
登记
成交价 GBP 32,760
登记
详情
ALBRECHT DÜRER (1471-1528)
The Great Column with the Satyr (Block IV)
woodcut
1517
on laid paper, watermark Arms of Nuremberg (similar to Meder 205 & 206)
a very good, strong impression of this very rare print
Meder's state 2-a (of b), with the right arm re-cut but before many gaps in the contours
trimmed outside the subject on all sides
in very good condition
Image 400 x 222 mm.
Sheet 410 x 266 mm.
来源
Wilhelm Eduard Drugulin (1825-79), Leipzig (Lugt 2612).
Ralf Leopold von Retberg (1812-1885), Munich (Lugt 2822); presumably acquired from the above; his posthumous sale, Amsler & Ruthardt, Berlin, 4 March 1886, lot 277 (with another sheet) (Mk. 106).
Private German Collection; then by descent.
Acquired from the above by the present owner.
出版
Bartsch 129; Meder p. 257 (as Dürer School); Schoch Mende Scherbaum 247
荣誉呈献
Stefano FranceschiSpecialist
佳士得专家或会联络阁下,以商讨此拍品,又或于拍品状况于拍卖前有所改变时知会阁下。浏览状况报告

拍品专文

Very few complete examples of the Large Column, consisting of four blocks, have survived, as such monumental prints were intended as decorations and usually pasted directly onto walls or large panels, which were eventually destroyed. Schoch, Mende and Scherbaum record a total of nine complete sets in public collections, and even these are mostly composite sets, consisting of impressions from different printing periods. Impressions of single blocks are equally rare and early ones practically unobtainable. The present print is a slightly later impression of the most important, upper section of the column. The watermark dates the sheet to the middle of the 16th century. By this point, the satyr's left arm had cracked and was then replaced with a newly cut plug, which was inserted into the original block shortly after. It lacks the delicacy of the earliest printings, as can be observed by comparing the two examples in the Albertina (inv. no. DG1935/993/4 and /5), the first being Meder's state 1.c, the latter Meder's state 2.b, with more gaps in the lines than the present impression.
Out of stylistic considerations, Meder did not regard the Column as a work of Dürer himself, but included it in his catalogue raisonné of 1932 as 'Dürer School'. This assessment is difficult to uphold, given the very close relation between the woodcut and the drawing with watercolour in the British Museum (museum no. SL,5218.87-89; Winkler 714), which is clearly a preparatory work for the print. Dagmar Eichberger, who had worked specifically on the Dürer's monumental woodcuts, furthermore points to one of the artist's drawings in the margins of the Prayerbook for Maximilian I (Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, Munich, fol. 19 r., dated circa 1515), which already shows a column of the same principal design (see Schoch Mende Scherbaum no. 247, p. 440-441). It is unconceivable that a subject which had clearly occupied Dürer not once but twice within a period of approximately two years would be the design of another artist or be cut and printed as a woodcut in another workshop.
Schoch, Mende and Scherbaum recorded the following impressions of the present fourth block: Munich (Meder I-a); Nuremberg (M. I-b); Vienna, Berlin (M. I-c); Braunschweig (M. I-d); Vienna, unknown location, formerly Wünsch Collection (M. I-f); Dresden, Nuremberg, Paris (M. II-a); Stuttgart, Vienna, Coburg, Munich (M. II-b). To this we can add another Meder II-b impression at the Metropolitan Museum, New York.

相关文章

Sorry, we are unable to display this content. Please check your connection.

更多来自
古典大师版画
参与竞投
状况报告 

佳士得专家或会联络阁下,以商讨此拍品,又或于拍品状况于拍卖前有所改变时知会阁下。

本人确认已阅读有关状况报告的重要通知 并同意其条款。 查阅状况报告